WAIT… A CRIMINAL PSYCHOLOGIST JUST OFFERED A CHILLING NEW THEORY ABOUT NANCY GUTHRIE’S DISAPPEARANCE. 😳💔 — AND HE SAYS THE CASE MAY BE FAR DIFFERENT FROM THE KIDNAPPING STORY MANY HAVE BEEN FOLLOWING A renowned forensic psychologist who once helped convince O.J. Simpson to surrender has now weighed in on the disappearance of Savannah Guthrie’s mother, Nancy Guthrie. Dr. Kris Mohandie believes the 84-year-old may have been caught in what he described as a burglary that went terribly wrong, rather than being the target of a sophisticated kidnapping plot. He also raised serious questions about the authenticity of the ransom letters sent to the family, pointing to inconsistencies that he says deserve scrutiny. While a masked figure was captured on doorbell footage and investigators continue pursuing leads, Mohandie stressed that his theory remains only a hypothesis and that authorities must keep an open mind. But the disturbing detail he noticed in the alleged ransom messages could change how investigators look at the entire case… 👀

A renowned criminal psychologist who helped convince O.J. Simpson to surrender to authorities said he believes Nancy Guthrie’s disappearance was likely a burglary gone wrong.

“Unfortunately, I think this case is a simple matter of a burglary gone wrong and then attempts to cover things up,” forensic psychologist Dr. Kris Mohandie told Fox Digital.

The expert said that the creepy doorbell camera footage that shows a masked man at the 84-year-old’s front door on the night of the abduction suggests that the mother of “Today” show host Savannah Guthrie was the victim of burglary in her home rather than a sophisticated kidnapping plot.

Mohandie said that it’s “appropriate” for law enforcement to investigate any leads into finding out the fate of the matriarch’s disappearance.

However, he said it’s still doubtful that the two ransom letters sent to the family – which were recently released by the Pima County Sheriff’s Office in full – are in any way related to those who took her from her home back in February.

The famed forensic psychologist — who has described how he appealed to former NFL star-turned-murderer Simpson’s ego to surrender to cops on June 17, 1994 — pointed out issues in the first ransom note, saying that despite it referencing the crime scene, including Guthrie’s Apple Watch and a broken floodlight, it should be treated skeptically.

“I don’t make much out of those two details,” Mohandie said.

“They seem to be details that inadvertently could have gotten to somebody, and so that’s not enough for me to say, this is something only the killer would know.”

Mohandie also pointed out the inconsistent way the writer uses the pronouns “we” and “I,” the declaration of it as a ransom note and the decision to send it to a news outlet.

“There are a lot of things wrong with that ransom note, and it raised a lot of questions for me of veracity,” he said.

The psychologist also questioned the legitimacy of the second purported ransom letter.

That note claimed Guthrie had died just days after the alleged kidnapping – and left Mohandie wondering why a kidnapper would out themselves for such a grave action, then offer an apology.

But he said that is his own personal hypothesis, and that investigators may discover something different themselves.

“A good investigation keeps an open mind,” he said. “It really does.”

SOURCE: NYPOST