It used to almost always be a two-tribe game, but those days are long gone.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():format(webp)/Survivor-cast-Jeff-Probst-03403a278b9644d292d4f76d093c4725.jpg)
Survivor fans love to debate and discuss all the intricacies of their favorite reality competition show. And it goes way beyond just arguing about the best seasons (Micronesia, Heroes vs. Villains, Cagayan, David vs. Goliath) and best players (Tony Vlachos, Parvati Shallow, Kim Spradlin, Sandra Diaz-Twine).
The passionate opinions expressed by fans extend to seemingly (but not!) trivial subjects like the final two vs. final three, the controversial fire-making addition, and pretty much every single twist ever put into the game. And many opinions were indeed voiced last week when a tribe swap on Survivor 51 turned two tribes into three.
First, a little history. The early era of Survivor almost always featured two tribes. Of the first 24 seasons of the show, 21 featured two tribes battling each other. But then, producers started to mix things up. Sometimes the game would be two tribes going head-to-head; other seasons would feature a three-tribe setup, and then there would also be seasons that started with two tribes but quickly divided into three. (Sound familiar, Survivor 51 fans?)
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():format(webp)/Survivor-challenge-090c3ed237364c54beca162bafca09b1.jpg)
Jeff Probst discussed the preference for three tribes — especially after tribe swaps — with Entertainment Weekly during the Millennials vs. Gen X season.
“There really isn’t any big secret plan,” he said then after a mid-game move from two to three tribes. “It’s just about keeping the tribes off base. Fortunately for us and them, we’ve done enough seasons that we’ve switched and merged at various times with various numbers so you can’t ever fully be sure about what is coming next. Going to three tribes just makes it very difficult for alliances to stay together. Even if you promise to stay together before a switch, the events that take place after the switch often have to take precedence over previous agreements.”
There is something else Probst and producers did not love back then about two big tribes: It often made for obvious votes after one majority alliance established dominance and predictably voted out others in quick succession, draining some of the drama for viewers watching at home and hoping for a blindside.
Perhaps that is why, with the start of the New Era in season 41, every single installment began with three tribes. It was just one of the ways in which the New Era seasons all blended together. Which is why many fans — and players themselves, as seen in the premiere — were so excited to see Survivor 51 begin with not three, but two tribes.
However, last week’s fourth episode once again split the two groups into three in what mirrored the start of New Era seasons with three tribes of six players each (although one tribe on 51 had only 5 contestants due to Rob Antonson quitting the game)
Supporters of a three-tribe format will tell you that it makes the game less predictable and there is nowhere to hide with fewer tribemates around. Detractors will tell you that the smaller tribe size unfairly penalizes players seen as “weaker” because teams will often insist on keeping those they deem “stronger” for help in the challenges. (None of this is even considering last week’s added element of a tribe expansion coming via a tribe swap, in which players’ entire games can flip 180 degrees with the pick of a Buff. Just ask Jenna Doore about that.)
So which do you generally prefer? Are you in favor of two tribes with more players, or do you lean towards three tribes with fewer people? Since Survivor is all about voting, cast yours in the poll below, and also make sure to hit the comments to register your reasoning and present your unassailable argument for ultimate tribe number supremacy.
Survivors ready… GO!